Should You Study a Trade for Australia PR?
July 29, 2026

Should You Study a Trade for Australia PR? What Aussizz Group’s 189 Invite Data Shows

Trade occupations have received strong attention after the recent subclass 189 invitation activity. Many students, graduates and temporary visa holders are now reconsidering their Australia PR strategy because selected trade occupations appeared in invitation trends at comparatively lower points. 

Based on Aussizz Group’s internal subclass 189 invite data, there were 197 valid invite records reviewed. This is not the full national invitation list. It is an internal Aussizz Group trend sample, but it still gives useful insight into which occupation groups appeared, what points were visible and how applicants should interpret the data before making a major study decision. 

The data showed a wide points range from 65 to 95 points, with a median score of 80 points. Healthcare and nursing remained the largest visible group, but trades and construction-related occupations also showed strong activity, especially at the lower end of the points range. 

Aussizz Group has helped 200,000+ applicants to their Australian Dreams, and this trend highlights an important message: trade pathways may be worth considering, but studying a trade only because of one invitation trend can be risky. 

Aussizz Group’s 189 Invite Data Shows Trades Were Visible, But Healthcare Was Still the Largest Group 

The internal data reviewed by Aussizz Group showed invitations across healthcare, trades, science, social work, education, business, engineering and technical occupations. Healthcare and allied health profiles made up the largest visible category, while trades and construction formed the second-largest broad group. 

Broad occupation group Records reviewed Share of internal data Points range Median points 
Nursing and health 81 41.1% 75–90 80 
Trades and construction 39 19.8% 65–90 70 
Science, agriculture and environment 20 10.2% 80–95 90 
Social work and welfare 18 9.1% 75–85 80 
Business, economics and management 4.6% 80–95 90 
Education 3.6% 75–90 80 
Engineering and technical 2.0% 80–95 92.5 
Other occupations 19 9.6% 70–85 80 

The most important takeaway is that trades were visible, but they were not the only story. Nursing and health still represented the largest share of Aussizz Group’s reviewed 189 invite records. 

For applicants already studying nursing, allied health, social work, teaching, IT, engineering or another skilled field, this matters. A trade trend should not automatically push someone to abandon an existing pathway that may still be valid. 

Trade Occupations Appeared at Lower Points in the Internal Data 

The trade trend is still important because selected trade occupations appeared at lower points compared with many professional and technical occupations. In the reviewed records, trades and construction-related profiles ranged from 65 to 90 points, with a median of 70 points

Trade-related occupation trend Points range seen 
Carpenter and carpenter-related roles 65–75 
Bricklayer 65–70 
Wall and Floor Tiler 65 
Welder and fabrication-related roles 75–85 
Construction Project Manager 80–90 
Broader trades and construction group 65–90 

This explains why trade courses are getting attention. When applicants see trade profiles at 65, 70 or 75 points, it can look like a more accessible PR direction than occupations where visible points are 85, 90 or 95. 

However, this is only a trend from the reviewed records. It does not mean 65 points will be enough in a future round. It also does not mean every trade occupation will perform the same way. A carpenter, bricklayer, welder and construction project manager may all sit under a broad trade or construction discussion, but their skills assessment, employment evidence, work duties and invitation competitiveness can be very different. 

The 80-Point Pattern Was the Strongest Overall Signal 

Across the 197 invite records reviewed, 80 points appeared most frequently. This means the lowest points should not be the only number applicants focus on. 

Points score Number of records Share of internal data 
65 11 5.6% 
70 11 5.6% 
75 18 9.1% 
80 98 49.7% 
85 36 18.3% 
90 15 7.6% 
95 3.6% 

Almost half of the reviewed records were at 80 points. This suggests that while lower-point trade invites attracted attention, the broader internal data still leaned heavily toward the 80-point range. 

Applicants should compare their score within their own occupation group. A trade applicant at 70 points and a science applicant at 90 points are not necessarily competing in the same way. Occupation demand, ranking, date of effect and invitation settings can change the outcome. 

Nursing and Health Profiles Were Stronger in Volume Than Trades 

The internal data showed 81 nursing and health-related records, representing 41.1% of the reviewed sample. Registered Nurse-related occupations were especially visible, including Registered Nurses nec, Registered Nurse Aged Care, Registered Nurse Mental Health and other nursing-related profiles. 

Health-related trend Points range seen 
Registered Nurse-related profiles 75–90 
Physiotherapy-related profiles 75–80 
Medical and allied health profiles 80–90 
Overall nursing and health group 75–90 

This is important because some applicants may look only at trade occupations and miss the bigger picture. Healthcare remained highly visible in the data. For students already progressing through nursing, allied health or a medical-related pathway, it may still make sense to complete that direction and lodge an Expression of Interest when eligible. 

Switching from nursing to a trade purely because a few trades appeared at lower points may not be the right decision. The better decision depends on the applicant’s study stage, visa timeline, skills assessment pathway, English score and career interest. 

Science, Engineering and Technical Profiles Often Needed Higher Points 

The internal data also showed that science, environment, agriculture, engineering and technical occupations appeared at higher points compared with many trade records. Science, agriculture and environment profiles had a median of 90 points, while engineering and technical profiles had a median of 92.5 points in the reviewed sample. 

Professional or technical group Points range Median points 
Science, agriculture and environment 80–95 90 
Business, economics and management 80–95 90 
Engineering and technical 80–95 92.5 
Education 75–90 80 
Social work and welfare 75–85 80 

This shows why applicants in technical or professional fields may feel pressure when comparing themselves with trade invite trends. However, a higher points pattern does not automatically mean the pathway is bad. It may simply mean the occupation group is more competitive in that sample. 

A strong professional pathway can still work through subclass 189, subclass 190, subclass 491, employer sponsorship or other suitable options. Applicants should not compare one low-point trade outcome with their entire career pathway without checking alternatives. 

A Trade Pathway Is Not a One-Year PR Shortcut 

The biggest risk in the current trade discussion is misunderstanding the timeline. A trade occupation may appear attractive because selected records showed lower points, but becoming eligible as a trade applicant can take time. 

For many Australian-trained trade graduates, the Trades Recognition Australia Job Ready Program is an important step. It is an employment-based skills assessment pathway for international student graduates of Australian VET trade courses. The program includes a minimum of 12 months of full-time or equivalent part-time paid employment in the nominated occupation. 

This is why a trade pathway should not be sold as something that can be completed and converted into PR in one year. Even if a person completes a shorter course pathway, they still need relevant work, assessment steps and time. 

Student Visa and 485 Visa Applicants Need Different Trade Timelines 

The trade timeline can look different depending on the applicant’s current visa situation. Someone already on a 485 visa may be looking for a faster study option, while someone on a Student visa may be starting from the beginning. Either way, the skills assessment and employment requirement still need planning. 

Applicant situation Practical concern 
Student visa holder starting trade study Course duration, tuition, visa conditions and future 485 planning matter 
485 visa holder considering trade study Remaining visa time must fit study, employment and assessment steps 
Applicant with no trade background Needs real training and practical employment experience 
Applicant already working in a trade May be stronger if work matches the nominated occupation 
Applicant with visa expiry pressure Trade pathway may not fit if time is too short 

For many applicants, the practical timeline can be at least two years, and sometimes longer. The pathway may involve study, relevant employment, Job Ready Program participation, assessment processing and then EOI or visa strategy. 

That timing is important because the latest 189 trend may not predict what will happen two years later. 

Invitation Trends are Useful, But They are Not Future Guarantees 

Aussizz Group’s internal data shows that trades were visible and some were invited at lower points. That is useful information. However, a current invitation trend is not a guarantee of future invitations. 

Migration planning should use invitation data as one factor. It should also include occupation suitability, skills assessment rules, English score, age, visa expiry, state nomination options, employer sponsorship, regional willingness and long-term career goals. 

Applicants Should Not Abandon Existing IT, Nursing or Professional Pathways Too Quickly 

Applicants already studying or working in IT, nursing, engineering, teaching, social work or another skilled field should be cautious before switching to trades. A half-completed or nearly completed pathway may still be valuable. 

Existing pathway Why it may still be worth completing 
Nursing or allied health Health formed 41.1% of Aussizz Group’s reviewed records 
Social work Social and welfare profiles appeared across 75–85 points 
Teaching Education profiles appeared across 75–90 points 
Engineering or technical roles Higher points, but still visible in the data 
IT or professional roles May have 190, 491 or employer sponsorship options 

A person who is already close to a skills assessment in their current field may be better off completing that process and lodging an EOI. Switching to a trade may reset the timeline and create new costs. 

The stronger approach is to compare both options before changing direction. 

A Better PR Strategy Compares 189 With 190, 491, DAMA and Sponsorship 

A trade pathway should not rely only on subclass 189. Many applicants may have stronger options through state nomination, regional visas or employer sponsorship depending on their occupation and employment situation. 

This matters because invitation trends can change. A trade applicant who prepares only for subclass 189 may miss other opportunities. A broader strategy can give more flexibility. 

Final Advice Before Studying a Trade for Australia PR 

Aussizz Group’s internal 189 invite data shows a clear trend: trade occupations were visible, and selected trade profiles appeared at lower points. Trades and construction-related occupations made up 19.8% of the reviewed records, with a median of 70 points. However, healthcare and nursing remained the largest group, making up 41.1% of the reviewed records. 

The data is useful, but it should not be treated as a future guarantee. Studying a trade is not a one-year shortcut. For many applicants, the pathway involves course completion, relevant paid employment, the Job Ready Program, skills assessment and then skilled migration planning. 

Applicants already studying IT, nursing, engineering, teaching, social work or another skilled field should not abandon their pathway without a proper comparison. A current invitation trend may not predict what happens when a new trade student becomes eligible two years later. 

Trade study can be a good option if it fits the applicant’s career interest, practical ability, visa timeline and long-term migration strategy. It should not be chosen only because a recent 189 trend looked favourable. 

Aussizz Group can help applicants compare trade pathways, existing occupation options, skills assessment timelines, subclass 189 trends, state nomination, regional pathways and employer sponsorship possibilities. 

Aussizz Group has helped 200,000+ applicants to their Australian Dreams, and the right guidance can help you make a PR decision based on strategy, not panic. 

FAQs 

Q1. Should I study a trade for Australia PR after the recent 189 invite trend? 

Studying a trade may be a good option if it suits your career goals, visa timeline and skills assessment pathway. It should not be chosen only because selected trade occupations appeared at lower points in one invite trend. 

Q2. What did Aussizz Group’s internal 189 invite data show? 

Aussizz Group reviewed 197 valid internal subclass 189 invite records. Nursing and health made up 41.1% of the reviewed records, while trades and construction made up 19.8%. The overall points range was 65 to 95, with a median of 80 points. 

Q3. Which trade occupations appeared in the internal 189 invite data? 

The reviewed data included trade and construction-related occupations such as carpenter, carpenter and joiner, bricklayer, wall and floor tiler, welder, metal fabricator, plasterer. 

Q4. Were trade occupations invited at lower points? 

Some selected trade occupations appeared at lower points in the reviewed data. Carpenter-related roles appeared from 65 to 75 points, bricklayer from 65 to 70 points, and wall and floor tiler at 65 points. 

Q5. Does this mean trade occupations will get invited again at low points? 

No. The data is a useful trend, but it does not guarantee future invitations. Invitation patterns can change based on government priorities, occupation demand, points ranking and timing. 

Q6. How long does the trade pathway take for PR? 

For many applicants, the pathway can take at least two years or longer because it may include study, relevant paid trade employment, Job Ready Program participation, assessment steps and then EOI or visa planning. 

Q7. What is the Job Ready Program? 

The Job Ready Program is a Trades Recognition Australia skills assessment pathway for international graduates of Australian VET trade courses who are working in Australia. It includes a minimum of 12 months of full-time or equivalent part-time paid employment in the nominated occupation. 

Q8. Should I switch from nursing or IT to a trade course? 

Do not switch only because of one invitation trend. If your current occupation can support a skills assessment, EOI or another PR pathway, it may still be worth completing and comparing with trade options. 

Q9. Can trade workers apply for 190 or 491 instead of 189? 

Yes. Trade workers may also explore subclass 190, subclass 491, employer sponsorship or DAMA depending on occupation, state demand, regional location and employer support. 

Q10. Can Aussizz Group help me compare trade and non-trade PR options? 

Yes. Aussizz Group can help review your current occupation, trade study options, TRA skills assessment pathway, visa timeline, EOI strategy and alternative PR pathways before you make a major decision.

As Seen in Media

Featured Across

We are featured in almost every prominent media group for our customer-centric approach and solution-oriented services.